Mistakes that can compromise your small-value claim

The procedure is designed to be accessible without a lawyer, but a few recurring mistakes can seriously weaken your chances of success. Here they are, one by one.

Filing the claim without sufficient evidence

Claimants sometimes file claims without attached contracts, invoices or correspondence. Attach everything you have and present it in an organised, chronological order.

Miscalculating the amount

An inflated claim looks less credible before the court; one that is too small leaves you without full compensation. Calculate the loss precisely — direct losses, related expenses and, where appropriate, a moral component, but treated as a secondary element.

Not knowing the applicable law

If the claim concerns a consumer contract, a delayed flight or an unsolicited commercial message, read up on the relevant law before formulating the claim — your arguments gain in precision.

Unclear wording of the claim

A long, vague or disorganised claim makes the judge's work harder. Present the facts chronologically, concisely, with the claim clearly stated at the end.

Not preparing for a possible hearing

Even though the small-value claims procedure is written, the judge may decide to summon the parties. Prepare as if the hearing will take place.

Ignoring a settlement offer

A reasonable settlement can end the dispute faster and more reliably than a court judgment.

Lack of respect towards the opposing party

A calm, factual tone leaves a better impression than a hostile or condescending one.

Impatience

The law provides a maximum period of 6 months for resolution — but the procedure still takes time. Thorough preparation and patience usually pay off more than haste.

One extra note: moral harm

Moral damages are admissible under Moldovan law, but the court generally treats them as an ancillary element, conditional on proving a clear causal link. Focus first on the proven material loss, then add the moral component if appropriate.

This article is for general information and does not constitute legal advice for an individual case.